Record current Google CPU incremental and prepared reader checks
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
66bf7d7b47
commit
8c005f5f57
1 file changed
+26
@@ -113,3 +113,29 @@ encoder calls does not mean zero work or prove fast first input.
|
||||
|
||||
Synthetic colored-image and sine-wave fixtures prove actual vector reuse and
|
||||
citation equality; they do not establish useful media relevance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current Windows CPU integration rerun, 2026-10-13
|
||||
|
||||
At source `66bf7d7b4757c1454e4cd61e514ff9376bddd728` with a clean worktree,
|
||||
the normal current worker SHA-256
|
||||
`c01cb3ec13cfca722ee768e8350e1399a8b9a4d14a24a35adc3473a5cfc82a73`
|
||||
ran all three `incremental_google_cpu` tests successfully in 75.47 seconds.
|
||||
Actual Google inference was explicitly CPU-only with one thread. Verified
|
||||
Google assets and the pinned Windows FFmpeg/FFprobe helpers were used.
|
||||
|
||||
The checks cover completed-vector reuse after failed activation and reopen,
|
||||
document/code moves with preserved citations, title-change reencoding, mixed
|
||||
document/image/audio/video reuse, and byte-changing media overwrites with
|
||||
identical size/mtime. The prepared-reader test also passed in 14.04 seconds:
|
||||
publication preserved the real query-vector LRU and shared prepared ANN graph,
|
||||
returned updated source content, and a distinct query executed genuine inference.
|
||||
Observed service times were 2.962 ms for the cached query and 84.808 ms for the
|
||||
distinct query, on a one-document fixture. These are debug-profile integration
|
||||
observations, not desktop first-input, scale or release latency acceptance.
|
||||
|
||||
Command: `cargo test -p searchi-service --test prepared_google_cpu --test
|
||||
incremental_google_cpu --locked -- --ignored --nocapture --test-threads=1`,
|
||||
with `SEARCHI_FORCE_CPU=1` and the verified model/worker/decoder environment
|
||||
variables described in SKILLS.md. All four tests executed, none skipped.
|
||||
The running installed user application was left untouched. Other platform,
|
||||
storage-contention and representative-corpus gates remain open.
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user